A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning potential neighbours more than the construction of the wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances short article about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, find to create their household residence. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially within a delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which can be partly crafted, is in the proper place. Their authorized staff has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both of those really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic on the intensity in the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of steps had been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
Within the Main of your dispute is a disagreement more than boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as made, goes further than what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and circumstances hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is motivated by worry for environmental defense and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private view, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple basically attempting to produce a family members property in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches over a Particular Space of Conservation and say that each one functions are carried out depending on Qualified advice and authorized strategies. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean all through a storm, usually do not alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for any circumstance that many observers see as more and more typical. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to local advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waist-high water through a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of midsection-high h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme solution.
As the High Court proceedings go on, the end result remains uncertain. The court docket must figure out if the wall as designed complies with organizing authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and preparing situations. Yet the human ingredient remains central: neighbours who need to Dwell alongside each other lengthy once the lawful charges have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation René Collier of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most carefully viewed arranging disputes in north Dublin recently.