A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national awareness following an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Times write-up about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek out to construct their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally inhabitants of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging permission by creating a wall past the boundaries of their website, bringing about an encroachment on a Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls below European and Irish environmental law. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, especially in a very delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partly constructed, is in the right placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the action being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-higher h2o all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Periods, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic from the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that such actions ended up cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately from the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and problems attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple just trying to make a family residence in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be completed based upon professional suggestions and accredited designs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute above building of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description to get a circumstance that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will in the end be altered, taken out, or done as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.